1 2026Are Latin American Players in Fact Safer Today?
melba934237683 edited this page 2026-04-29 01:25:53 +08:00


The prospect of over guideline and too much disturbance is pressing players towards the black market, where there are no safer gambling guardrails or player security measures in place.
n n n nThat was a clear conclusion from SBC Media u2019s latest webinar session, u2018Are Latin American Players Actually Safer Today? u2019 in which numerous market professionals came together to talk about the state of play on player protection in the area. It featured:
n n n nLuiz Felipe Maia - Founding Partner, MAIA YOSHIYASU ADVOGADOS. n n n nSimon Westbury - Strategic Advisor, 1xBet. n n n nSimon Vincze - Head of Sustainable & Safer Gambling, Casino Guru. n n n nAlfredo Lazcano - Gaming Lawyer, Lazcano Samano. n n n n nIs excessive guideline denting gamer security? n n n nLatin America is at a crossroads when it pertains to betting policy. A varied region, it makes up offshore-grey markets, provincially controlled markets and fully federal or national regulatory structures.
n n n nBut there are some examples of policy being changed, with propositions in Brazil to ban sponsorship and propositions to raise taxes in both Brazil and Mexico triggering issue among operators.
n n n nThe panel was consentaneous in supporting regulated markets and the expansion of new markets throughout Latin America, but there are clear warning signs that excessive interference causes more harm than great.
n n n nMaia shared his experience as an expert in Brazil u2019s framework, noting: u201cIt's a curve. You come to the optimal point of defense but when policy becomes extreme, the players end up being less protected due to the fact that channeling is hurt. u201d
n n n nVincze did acknowledge that over-regulation can be hazardous for gamers, but pressed back on the concept that regulated markets are inherently unsafe environments.
n n n n u201cIt would be improper to speak about policy in a sense that they wouldn't be much safer, because a minimum of now they have a choice which is supplying a sufficient structure for security and it is oversighted by an authority. u201d
n n n nConfusion amongst Latin American players n n n nThe Webinar was hosted along with 1xBet, which commissioned SBC Media to produce the International Player Safety Index series. Part three of the series was released just recently focusing on Latin America and the webinar sessions supplied a platform to dispute a few of its findings.
n n n nSimon Westbury, Strategic Advisor at 1xBet, spoke with SBC News just recently extensive on the findings of the report, and he showed on the absence of consistency across regulation in Latin America.
n n n nIt enhances Westbury u2019s Three Cs theory: if a market has no clearness, consistency or interaction, then a Big C emerges - confusion.
n n n n u201cI think there's a space in consistency across Latin America, and we're not stating that there needs to be a one-size-fits-all technique to gamer security due to the fact that every gamer is various. But there requires to be player security enshrined in every . u201d he noted.
n n n nThe theory is substantiated in practice, too. Vincze had actually assessed some research study he had carried out, utilizing Google search analysis in Brazil and Mexico to estimate channelisation rates in those markets.
n n n nFollowing his analysis over a thirty days period, Vincze mentioned that 74% of specific casino name keywords searches were for offshore sites in Brazil, while that rate is 56% in Mexico. For recommendation, the UK sits at around 20%, Sweden 21% and Spain 27%.
n n n nVincze kept in mind: u201cI think it's since there is significantly more direct exposure on the internet on social media for brands which are not licensed and which can advertise themselves through influencers, through social media, strong accounts, without real enforcement. u201d
n n n nWhere can things improve n n n nThe good news is that operators have a variety of tools at their disposal to assist gamers protect on website. KYC measures are the very first port of call, but others like deposit limits, time frame and cooling off periods have likewise been pointed out as working for gamers globally.
n n n nYet the panel noted that these tools can in fact trigger more confusion than good, if not applied effectively.
n n n nLuzcano said: "Safer gambling tools can be tough to utilize and operators don't understand how to appropriately explain how to utilize them to the players. In the worst case circumstance, these tools might be simply disregarded by gamers. u201d
n n n nMaia mentioned another Brazilian example, where a self-exclusion list has been presented nationally. But due to the fact that of an absence of understanding of the purpose, it has led to scams versus operators instead of assisting gamers.
n n n nHe said: u201cWe do not see the regulator and the federal government supporting the managed market. We had individuals with social benefits banned from playing, then we had hazards to increase taxation in Brazil. What I believe is the message that this depicts and the result is that we have the Brazilian authorities driving the gamers to the illegal market. u201d
n n n nWestbury noted that tools must concentrate on education and making things fun and engaging, instead of limiting and, in his words, medical.
n n n n u201cI think in some cases we get it wrong as an industry. Some of these tools are invasive. No one likes to go to the medical professional, nobody likes to go to the dental expert due to the fact that of this clinical environment and it's not enjoyable, normally. I think really, we need to be at the point of education.